Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2022; 10(24): 8547-8555
Published online Aug 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8547
Published online Aug 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8547
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups of patients, n (%)
Normal information | Research group (n = 44) | Control group (n = 44) | t/χ2 value | P value |
Age (yr) | 60.6 ± 5.0 | 61.3 ± 5.5 | -0.625 | 0.534 |
Lesion diameter (cm) | 5.18 ± 1.00 | 5.08 ± 1.30 | 0.404 | 0.687 |
Serum AFP (ng/L) | 240.8 ± 75.6 | 228.6 ± 66.3 | 0.805 | 0.423 |
Sex | 0.733 | 0.392 | ||
Male | 26 (59.09) | 22 (50.00) | ||
Female | 18 (40.91) | 22 (50.00) | ||
Child-Pugh stage | 1.252 | 0.263 | ||
A stage | 40 (100) | 37 (84.09) | ||
B stage | 4 (9.09) | 7 (15.91) | ||
Hepatitis B virus infection | 1.286 | 0.257 | ||
Yes | 32 (72.73) | 27 (61.36) | ||
No | 12 (27.27) | 17 (38.64) | ||
Surgical resection range | 0.786 | 0.375 | ||
≥ 3 liver segments | 18 (40.91) | 14 (31.82) | ||
< 3 liver segments | 26 (59.09) | 30 (68.18) |
- Citation: Liu D, Fang JM, Chen XQ. Clinical significance of half-hepatic blood flow occlusion technology in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(24): 8547-8555
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i24/8547.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8547