Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2022; 10(24): 8535-8546
Published online Aug 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8535
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate logistic models for identifying risk factors of post-transarterial chemoembolization liver failure1
VariablesUnivariate
P valueMultivariate
P value
OR
95%CI
OR
95%CI
Microsphere plus gelatin embolization, yes vs no8.02.8-22.7< 0.0014.41.2-16.30.027
Combination with RFA, yes vs no0.30.1-0.90.0350.30.1-1.20.094
Main tumor size ≥ 5 cm, yes vs no2.11.2-3.80.0142.31.05-5.30.039
Resection history, yes vs no0.40.2-0.90.0340.40.2-0.950.039
Diabetes, yes vs no0.40.2-1.10.0840.30.1-1.030.056
Hematocrit, per increase 1%1.11.0-1.10.0341.10.997-1.10.06
ALT, per increase 1 U/L1.011.0-1.030.0261.010.99-1.030.262
AST, per increase 1 U/L1.01.0-1.010.0740.990.98-1.0040.177
GGT, per increase 1 U/L1.01.0-1.00.081.01.0-1.00.499
TBiL, μmol/L
NormalReference-1.0Reference-1.0
1-2 ULN1.81.0-3.50.0651.80.8-4.20.163
≥ 2 ULN2.31.0-5.30.0622.10.6-7.50.269
DBiL, per increase 1 μmol/L1.81.0-3.20.0540.990.96-1.020.718
TBA ≥ 17.7μmol/L, yes vs no1.81.0-3.30.0441.60.7-3.50.263
Serum cystatin C, per increase 1 mg/L0.40.1-1.00.0410.60.1-3.60.584
Creatinine, per increase 1 μmol/L0.980.97-1.00.0480.990.95-1.020.499
eGFR, per increase 1 ml/(min∙1.73 m2)1.011.0-1.020.0331.00.98-1.020.81