Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 16, 2022; 10(23): 8205-8211
Published online Aug 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i23.8205
Published online Aug 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i23.8205
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data among the five groups (mean ± SE)
Group | n | Age (yr) | BMI (kg/m2) | Sex (male/female) |
Normal urinary protein group | 32 | 49.34 ± 4.28 | 24.33 ± 1.65 | 15/17 |
Microproteinuria group | 35 | 49.22 ± 4.34 | 24.31 ± 1.51 | 15/20 |
Massive proteinuria group | 40 | 49.25 ± 4.29 | 24.52 ± 1.52 | 29/11 |
Healthy group | 107 | 49.72 ± 4.11 | 24.49 ± 1.62 | 55/52 |
Simple diabetes group | 107 | 49.88 ± 4.69 | 24.59 ± 1.97 | 57/50 |
χ2/F value | - | 0.281 | 0.259 | 8.142 |
P value | - | 0.890 | 0.904 | 0.087 |
- Citation: Yang B, Zhao XH, Ma GB. Role of serum β2-microglobulin, glycosylated hemoglobin, and vascular endothelial growth factor levels in diabetic nephropathy. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(23): 8205-8211
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i23/8205.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i23.8205