Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2022; 10(22): 7760-7771
Published online Aug 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7760
Table 5 Performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing and the conventional methods in the diagnosis of central nervous system fungal infections

Sensitivity
Specificity
Accuracy
Positive predictive value
Negative predictive value
Conventional methods44.4% (26.0%, 64.4%)83.3% (36.5%, 99.1%)51.5% (33.9%, 68.8%)92.3% (62.1%, 99.6%)25.0% (9.6%, 49.4%)
mNGS63.0% (42.5%, 79.9%)100.0% (51.7%, 100.0%)69.7% (51.1%, 83.8%)100.0% (77.1%, 100.0%)37.5% (16.3%, 64.1%)
P value0.172 1.000 0.131 0.433 0.656