Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2022; 10(22): 7698-7707
Published online Aug 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7698
Published online Aug 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7698
Table 2 Surgical outcomes of patients treated surgically for anal stenosis
| Patient numbers | 21 (35%) | 39 (65%) | 60 | |
| Operative time (min) | 10.14 ± 2.31 | 21.62 ± 4.68 | < 0.001 | 17.6 ± 6.8 |
| Length of hospital stay (d) | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 2.9 ± 0.4 | < 0.001 | 2.62 ± 0.52 |
| Complications | ||||
| Acute urinary retention | 0 | 4 (10.3%) | - | 4 (6.7%) |
| Wound dehiscence | 0 | 0 | 0.129 | 0 |
| Wound infection | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Postoperative fever | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Postoperative bleeding | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- Citation: Weng YT, Chu KJ, Lin KH, Chang CK, Kang JC, Chen CY, Hu JM, Pu TW. Is anoplasty superior to scar revision surgery for post-hemorrhoidectomy anal stenosis? Six years of experience. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(22): 7698-7707
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i22/7698.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7698