Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2022; 10(21): 7356-7364
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7356
Table 2 Comparison of imaging features between schwannoma and neurofibroma
Imaging featuresSchwannoma (n = 21) (%)Neurofibroma (n = 12) (%)Chi-square valueP value
Location (Intramuscular space)11.9330.000a
Yes19 (90.5)3 (25.0)
No2 (9.5)9 (75.0)
Location (extrapyramidal space)11.9330.000a
Yes2 (9.5)9 (75.0)
No19 (90.5)3 (25.0)
Regular morphology0.0020.968
Yes16 (76.2)10 (83.3)
No5 (23.8)2 (16.7)
Bone involvement5.0850.024a
Yes3 (14.3)7 (58.3)
No18 (85.7)5 (41.7)
Homogeneous density/signal intensity0.0001.000
Yes6 (28.6)3 (25.0)
No15 (71.4)9 (75.0)