Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2022; 10(21): 7293-7301
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7293
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7293
Table 2 Comparison of general clinical data of patients with different flexibility scores, n (%)
Groups | Elasticity score 4-5 | Elasticity score 1-3 | t value | P value |
Cases | 57 | 33 | ||
Age (yr) | 50.06 ± 8.02 | 50.82 ± 9.11 | -0.412 | 0.681 |
ER positive | 35 (61.40) | 18 (54.55) | 0.406 | 0.524 |
PR positive | 30 (52.63) | 16 (48.48) | 0.144 | 0.705 |
Ki-67 > 14% | 32 (56.14) | 19 (57.58) | 0.018 | 0.895 |
HER2 positive | 14 (24.56) | 5 (15.15) | 1.111 | 0.292 |
Lesion diameter (cm) | 4.35 ± 1.13 | 4.30 ± 1.10 | 0.204 | 0.839 |
- Citation: Pan HY, Zhang Q, Wu WJ, Li X. Preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer evaluated using strain ultrasonic elastography. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(21): 7293-7301
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i21/7293.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7293