Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2022; 10(21): 7265-7274
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7265
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7265
Table 2 Baseline information of patients in the two groups
| Male (n, %) | Age (yr) | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | Heart rate (beats/min) | Body temperature (℃) | Systolic pressure (mmHg) | Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | |
| Experimental group (n = 198) | 109 (55.3) | 65.57 ± 10.47 | 164.83± 7.28 | 65.12 ± 9.191 | 76.9 ± 14.34 | 36.42 ± 0.33 | 147.48 ± 23.20 | 84.23 ± 14.00 |
| Control group (n = 201) | 132 (65.7) | 64.87 ± 10.75 | Missing | Missing | 78.2 ± 15.80 | 36.43 ± 0.34 | 150.30 ± 24.11 | 84.57 ± 14.43 |
| Statistic | 4.46 | 0.42 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.52 | 0.04 | 1.44 | 0.567 |
| P value | 0.35 | 0.674 | 0.6313 | 0.5939 | 0.603 | 0.965 | 0.15 | 0.57 |
- Citation: Zhang WW, Xin J, Zhang GY, Zhai QJ, Zhang HM, Wu CS. Efficacy of Guhong injection versus Butylphthalide and Sodium Chloride Injection for mild ischemic stroke: A multicenter controlled study. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(21): 7265-7274
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i21/7265.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7265