Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2022; 10(21): 7215-7223
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7215
Published online Jul 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7215
Ref. | Year | Preservation method | Prevalence of the ALL | Femoral origin | Tibial origin | Length of the ALL |
Vincent et al[13] | 2012 | Fresh-frozen cadaver | 100% | Anterior to the popliteus tendon insertion | Posterior to GT | 34.1 ± 3.4 mm |
Claes et al[3] | 2013 | Embalmed cadaver | 100% | Anterior to LCL | Between GT and FH | 38.5 ± 6.1 mm (0°) |
41.5 ± 6.7 (90°) | ||||||
Helito et al[24] | 2013 | Fresh-frozen cadaver | 100% | Anterior and distal to LCL | Between GT and FH | 37.3 ± 4.0 mm |
Dodds et al[23] | 2014 | Fresh-frozen cadaver | 83% | Proximal and posterior to LFE | Between GT and FH | 59.0 ± 4.0 mm |
Tightened at internal rotation and flexion | ||||||
Caterine et al[16] | 2015 | Fresh-frozen cadaver | 100% | Proximal and posterior to LCL | Between GT and FH | 40.3 ± 6.2 mm (0°) |
Kennedy et al[26] | 2015 | Fresh-frozen cadaver | 100% | Proximal and posterior to LFE | Between GT and FH | 36.8 mm (0°) |
41.6 mm (90°) | ||||||
Watanabe et al[20] | 2016 | Embalmed cadaver | 37% | Type I (ALL) | Between GT and FH (Type II-b, lateral aspect of tibial plateau) | N/A |
Overlapped LCL origin | ||||||
Posterior to LCL origin | ||||||
Anterior to LCL origin | ||||||
Type II (ALLT) | ||||||
Anterior to posterior of LCL origin | ||||||
Stijak et al[29] | 2016 | Embalmed cadaver | 50% | Anterior to LCL | Between GT and FH | 41.0 ± 3.0 mm |
Daggett et al[27] | 2016 | Fresh-frozen cadaver | 100% | Center of LFE, proximal and posterior to LFE | Between GT and FH | N/A |
Neri et al[28] | 2017 | Fresh-frozen cadaver | 95% | Proximal and posterior to LFE | Posterior and proximal to GT, anterior and proximal to FH, and distal to ACT | 50.4 ± 6.6 mm |
Goncharov et al[25] | 2018 | Fresh-frozen cadaver | 68% women | 65% proximal and posterior to LFE | Between GT and FH | 38.5 ± 4.4 mm |
42% men | 24% anterior to the origin of the LCL | Tightened in internal rotation and flexion | ||||
12% popliteus tendon insertion | ||||||
Olewnik et al[19] | 2018 | Embalmed cadaver | 64% | Type I, proximal and anterior to LCL | Type I, II-a, II-b, posterior to GT | 35.5 ± 7.3 mm |
Type II-a, proximal and posterior to LCL | Type III, blends with deep fascia | |||||
Type II-b, proximal and posterior to LCL | Type IV, posterior to GT and deep fascia | |||||
Type IV, LFE and anterior to LCL | Type V, posterior to GT | |||||
Type V, LCL | ||||||
Lima et al[21] | 2019 | Fresh-frozen cadaver | 100% | Proximal and posterior to LFE | Between GT and FH (4.0 mm to 7.0 mm below the tibial plateau) | 40.0 ± 0.4 mm |
Nasu et al[8] | 2020 | Embalmed cadaver | 0% (Complex of fibrous tissues with a sheet-like structure) | Proximal and posterior to LFE | Lateroposterior area to the GT | N/A |
Shetty et al[30] | 2021 | Embalmed cadaver | 9% (Two types, membranous wideband and cord-like ALL) | Anterior to LCL, proximal to LFE | GT | 35 ± 0.9 mm |
Patel et al[15] | 2021 | Fresh-frozen cadaver | 12% | Proximal and posterior to LFE | Between GT and FH | N/A |
- Citation: Park JG, Han SB, Rhim HC, Jeon OH, Jang KM. Anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee joint. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(21): 7215-7223
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i21/7215.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7215