Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2022; 10(20): 6876-6889
Published online Jul 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i20.6876
Published online Jul 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i20.6876
Figure 2 Comparison of the electromyography activity (mean ± SD) of the temporalis anterior and masseter muscle in the mandibular postural position and the intercuspal position maximal voluntary clenching.
A: Comparison of the average electromyography amplitudes in the mandibular postural position and intercuspal position maximal voluntary clenching; B: Comparison of the normalized muscle activity ratio in the mandibular postural position; C: Comparison of the intercuspal position activity index. aComparison to the NB group, P < 0.05; bComparison to the CB group, P < 0.05. CB: Centric bruxism; ECB: Eccentric bruxism; NB: Non-bruxism; TA: Temporalis anterior; MM: Masseter muscle; NMA: Normalized muscle activity.
- Citation: Lan KW, Jiang LL, Yan Y. Comparative study of surface electromyography of masticatory muscles in patients with different types of bruxism. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(20): 6876-6889
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i20/6876.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i20.6876