Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 14, 2022; 10(2): 547-553
Published online Jan 14, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.547
Published online Jan 14, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.547
Table 2 Examination methods and the diagnostic accuracy for early scar pregnancy types, n (%)
| Methods | Cases | Gestational sac | Heterogeneous mass | Uterine cavity | Accuracy |
| Intracavitary | 63 | 42/42 (100.00) | 15/16 (93.75) | 4/5 (80.00) | 61/63 (96.83) |
| Transabdominal | 63 | 38/42 (90.48) | 12/16 (75.00) | 3/5 (60.00) | 53/63 (84.13) |
| χ2 value | 2.363 | 0.948 | 0.000 | 4.513 | |
| P value | 0.124 | 0.330 | 1.000 | 0.034 |
- Citation: Cheng XL, Cao XY, Wang XQ, Lin HL, Fang JC, Wang L. Diagnosing early scar pregnancy in the lower uterine segment after cesarean section by intracavitary ultrasound. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(2): 547-553
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i2/547.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.547