Diagnostic accuracy of ≥ 16-slice spiral computed tomography for local staging of colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Table 1 Basic characteristics of studies included

Ref.	Year	Nationality	Sample size (case)	Gender (male/female)	Average age	Subjects	Slices of CT scan	Type of research
Tezcan et al[15]	2013	Turkey	159	115/44	60 (28-82)	Colorectal cancer	16	Retrospective
Rollven et al[16]	2013	Stockholm	29	17/11	73 ± 11.25	Colon cancer	64	Prospective
da Fonte et al[17]	2012	Turkey	25	12/13	59.8 ± 10	Colorectal cancer	16	Prospective
Sibileau et al[18]	2014	France	53	27/26	70 ± 11.75	Colon cancer	16	Prospective
Hunter et al[19]	2017	UK	58	34/26	69.3 ± 13.6	Colon cancer	16 or 64	Prospective
Lee et al[20]	2014	Korea	266	154/112	63.7 ± 13	Colon cancer	16	Retrospective
Maupoey et al[21]	2019	Spain	217	128/89	70 ± 13.75	Colon cancer	64	Prospective
Dighe et al[22]	2010	Royal	84		75 ± 10.5	Colon cancer	64	Prospective
Lao et al[23]	2013	Taiwan	152	82/70	66 ± 5.125	Colon cancer	64	Retrospective
Flor et al[24]	2013	Italy	69	31/38	68 ± 9	Colorectal cancer	64	Prospective
Malmstrøm et al[25]	2018	Denmark	501	271/230	69.4 ± 9.7	Colon cancer	64	Retrospective

CT: Computed tomography; MDCT: Multidetector row computed tomography.