Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2022; 10(18): 6091-6104
Published online Jun 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i18.6091
Published online Jun 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i18.6091
Outcomes of interest | Subgroup analysis | |||||||
Grouping criteria | Categories | Studies, n | Patients, n | OR | 95%CI | I2, % | P value | |
Induction of response | Anti-TNF naivety | Naïve | 3 | 727 | 1.17 | (0.80-1.70) | 0 | 0.41 |
Non-naïve | 3 | 313 | 1.44 | (0.55-3.78) | 47 | 0.46 | ||
Use optimization | Yes | 5 | 1040 | 1.27 | (0.93-1.74) | 0 | 0.14 | |
No | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | ||
Induction of remission | Anti-TNF naivety | Naïve | 2 | 392 | 1.08 | (0.68-0.72) | 0 | 0.75 |
Non-naïve | 2 | 420 | 1.15 | (0.67-1.96) | 0 | 0.62 | ||
Use optimization | Yes | 3 | 731 | 1.08 | (0.76-1.55) | 0 | 0.66 | |
No | 1 | 81 | 1.69 | (0.34-8.44) | - | 0.52 | ||
Maintenance of response | Anti-TNF naivety | Naïve | 5 | 1468 | 1.08 | (0.72-1.62) | 63 | 0.71 |
Non-naïve | 3 | 354 | 1.10 | (0.64-1.90) | 0 | 0.73 | ||
Use optimization | Yes | 6 | 1645 | 1.12 | (0.77-1.63) | 62 | 0.57 | |
No | 1 | 177 | 0.64 | (0.18-2.29) | - | 0.50 | ||
Maintenance of remission | Anti-TNF naivety | Naïve | 3 | 442 | 1.39 | (0.92-2.11) | 0 | 0.12 |
Non-naïve | 3 | 328 | 1.24 | (0.56-2.72) | 53 | 0.59 | ||
Use optimization | Yes | 3 | 458 | 1.41 | (0.95-2.09) | 0 | 0.09 | |
No | 3 | 312 | 1.18 | (0.46-2.99) | 55 | 0.73 | ||
Secondary loss of response | Anti-TNF naivety | Naïve | 3 | 353 | 1.09 | (0.54-2.18) | 42 | 0.81 |
Non-naïve | 3 | 947 | 0.91 | (0.46-1.80) | 72 | 0.78 | ||
Use optimization | Yes | 5 | 1247 | 1.07 | (0.69-1.67) | 56 | 0.75 | |
No | 1 | 53 | 0.48 | (0.13-1.68) | 54 | 0.99 | ||
Overall adverse events | Anti-TNF naivety | Naïve | 5 | 1184 | 0.67 | (0.50-0.89) | 1 | 0.005 |
Non-naïve | 4 | 469 | 0.41 | (0.31-1.31) | 79 | 0.13 | ||
Assessment time | ≤ 48 wk | 6 | 1323 | 0.50 | (0.33-0.76) | 41 | 0.001 | |
> 48 wk | 2 | 330 | 1.00 | (0.62-1.60) | 0 | 0.98 | ||
Severe adverse events | Anti-TNF naivety | Naïve | 3 | 1021 | 0.88 | (0.40-1.92) | 73 | 0.74 |
Non-naïve | 4 | 526 | 0.45 | (0.03-6.51) | 81 | 0.56 | ||
Assessment time | ≤ 48 wk | 4 | 746 | 1.32 | (0.80-2.19) | 0 | 0.28 | |
> 48 wk | 3 | 801 | 0.52 | (0.09-3.05) | 80 | 0.47 | ||
Opportunistic infections | Anti-TNF naivety | Naïve | 4 | 1654 | 0.78 | (0.54-1.14) | 0 | 0.21 |
Non-naïve | 2 | 256 | 1.88 | (0.93-3.82) | 0 | 0.08 | ||
Assessment time | ≤ 48 wk | 3 | 782 | 0.85 | (0.56-1.28) | 0 | 0.43 | |
> 48 wk | 3 | 1128 | 1.12 | (0.38-3.24) | 57 | 0.84 |
- Citation: Yang HH, Huang Y, Zhou XC, Wang RN. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in comparison to infliximab for Crohn's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(18): 6091-6104
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i18/6091.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i18.6091