Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2022; 10(17): 5577-5585
Published online Jun 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5577
Published online Jun 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5577
Table 5 Differences in inflammatory factors (ug/L) in patients of each group before and after ventilation
Group | CRP (mg/L) | PCT (ug/L) | IL-6 (ug/L) |
Conventional treatment group (n = 55) | 12.92 ± 1.06 | 20.85 ± 2.21 | 76.29 ± 3.75 |
Prone position ventilation treatment group (n = 47) | 12.80 ± 1.01 | 20.80 ± 2.25 | 76.25 ± 2.26 |
t value | 0.582 | 0.113 | 0.064 |
P value | 0.562 | 0.910 | 0.949 |
- Citation: Xia WH, Yang CL, Chen Z, Ouyang CH, Ouyang GQ, Li QG. Clinical evaluation of prone position ventilation in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by sepsis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(17): 5577-5585
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i17/5577.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5577