Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2022; 10(17): 5577-5585
Published online Jun 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5577
Published online Jun 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5577
Table 4 Differences in mechanical ventilation time and intensive care unit stay in patients in each group (d)
| Group | Mechanical ventilation time | ICU hospitalization |
| Conventional treatment group (n = 55) | 24.38 ± 7.95 | 30.02 ± 9.75 |
| Prone position ventilation treatment group (n = 47) | 23.88 ± 7.02 | 28.45 ± 8.23 |
| t value | 0.334 | 0.870 |
| P value | 0.739 | 0.386 |
- Citation: Xia WH, Yang CL, Chen Z, Ouyang CH, Ouyang GQ, Li QG. Clinical evaluation of prone position ventilation in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by sepsis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(17): 5577-5585
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i17/5577.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5577