Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2022; 10(17): 5541-5550
Published online Jun 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5541
Published online Jun 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5541
Table 2 Published randomized controlled trials related to chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine use for coronavirus disease 2019
DOI | Number of subjects | Patients’ age (mean ± SD) | Basic diseases (%) | Treatment plan | |
10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2020.03.03 | Experimental group | 15 | 50.5 ± 3.8 | 40.00% | Routine treatment + oral HCQ sulfate days 1-5, 400 mg QD |
Control group | 15 | 46.7 ± 3.6 | 33.30% | Routine treatment | |
10.1101/2020.03.22.20040758 | Experimental group | 31 | 45.2 ± 14.7 | NA | Standard treatment + oral HCQ sulfate days 1-5, 200 mg bid |
Control group | 31 | 44.1 ± 16.1 | NA | Standard treatment | |
10.1101/2020.04.10.20060558 | Experimental group | 75 | 48.0 ± 14.1 | 37.30% | Standard care + oral HCQ sulfate days 1-3, 1200 mg QD; Day 4 – 800 mg QD |
Control group | 75 | 44.1 ± 15.0 | 22.70% | Standard care | |
10.1101/2020.04.10.20060699 | Experimental group | 84 | 59 ± 48-67 | NA | Standard care + oral HCQ sulfate day 1 - 600 mg QD |
Control group | 97 | 63 ± 53-68 | NA | Standard care |
- Citation: Li QY, Lv Y, An ZY, Dai NN, Hong X, Zhang Y, Liang LJ. Ethical review of off-label drugs during the COVID-19 pandemic. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(17): 5541-5550
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i17/5541.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5541