Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 6, 2022; 10(16): 5208-5216
Published online Jun 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i16.5208
Figure 3
Figure 3 The endoscopic surgery group showed better clinical outcomes than the non-endoscopic group. A: The change of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score in the endoscopic group after surgery. n = 43. A two-tailed paired t-test was performed; B: The comparison in the GCS score between the endoscopic group and non-endoscopic group before surgery. Endoscopic group, n = 43; Non-endoscopic group, n = 53. The Kruskal–Wallis test was performed; C: The comparison of the drainage tube indwelling time between the endoscopic group and non-endoscopic group before surgery. Endoscopic group, n = 43; Non-endoscopic group, n = 53. The Kruskal–Wallis test was performed; D: The operation time in the endoscopic and non-endoscopic groups. Endoscopic group, n = 43; Non-endoscopic group, n = 53. The Kruskal–Wallis test was performed; E: The clearance rate of hematoma in the endoscopic and non-endoscopic groups. Endoscopic group, n = 43; Non-endoscopic group, n = 53. The Kruskal–Wallis test was performed; F: The change of the GCS score in the non-endoscopic group after surgery. n = 53. A two-tailed paired t-test was performed; G: The comparison of the GCS score between the endoscopic group and non-endoscopic group after surgery. Endoscopic group, n = 43; Non-endoscopic group, n = 53. The Kruskal–Wallis test was performed; H: The comparison of the Graeb score between the endoscopic group and non-endoscopic group after surgery. Endoscopic group, n = 43; Non-endoscopic group, n = 53. The Kruskal–Wallis test was performed. aP < 0.05, bP < 0.01, cP < 0.001; P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests were performed.