Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 6, 2022; 10(16): 5297-5305
Published online Jun 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i16.5297
Published online Jun 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i16.5297
Table 6 Comparison of the quality of life between the groups (mean ± SD)
Group | Functional limitation | Physiological pain and discomfort | Psychological and social | Total score | ||||
Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
Control group (n = 43) | 3.70 ± 1.52 | 1.70 ± 0.96 | 2.37 ± 1.57 | 1.21 ± 0.41 | 3.26 ± 1.54 | 1.56 ± 0.98 | 9.33 ± 2.54 | 4.47 ± 1.32 |
Intervention group (n = 43) | 3.74 ± 1.38 | 1.21 ± 0.68 | 2.33 ± 1.32 | 0.65 ± 0.48 | 3.21 ± 1.77 | 1.09 ± 0.75 | 9.28 ± 2.48 | 2.95 ± 1.11 |
t value | 0.148 | 2.721 | 0.148 | 5.773 | 0.130 | 2.466 | 0.086 | 5.755 |
P value | 0.882 | 0.008 | 0.882 | 0.000 | 0.897 | 0.016 | 0.932 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Yan LB, Zhou YC, Wang Y, Li LX. Orthodontic treatment combined with 3D printing guide plate implant restoration for edentulism and its influence on mastication and phonic function. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(16): 5297-5305
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i16/5297.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i16.5297