Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 6, 2022; 10(16): 5297-5305
Published online Jun 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i16.5297
Published online Jun 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i16.5297
Table 4 Comparison of the dental function between the groups (mean ± SD)
Group | Masticatory function | Swallowing function | Phonic function | |||
Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
Control group (n = 43) | 1.91 ± 0.29 | 3.09 ± 0.43 | 2.65 ± 0.48 | 3.63 ± 0.54 | 2.56 ± 0.98 | 3.26 ± 0.98 |
Intervention group (n = 43) | 1.98 ± 0.27 | 3.37 ± 0.49 | 2.67 ± 0.47 | 3.86 ± 0.41 | 2.58 ± 0.59 | 3.97 ± 0.64 |
t value | 1.154 | 2.821 | 0.225 | 2.255 | 0.133 | 4.052 |
P value | 0.252 | 0.006 | 0.822 | 0.027 | 0.894 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Yan LB, Zhou YC, Wang Y, Li LX. Orthodontic treatment combined with 3D printing guide plate implant restoration for edentulism and its influence on mastication and phonic function. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(16): 5297-5305
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i16/5297.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i16.5297