Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2022; 10(15): 4776-4784
Published online May 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i15.4776
Published online May 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i15.4776
Table 3 Comparison of the cervical range of motion between the two groups (n = 45)
Group | Disc height (mm) | Range of motion of the superior adjacent vertebra (°) | Range of motion of the inferior adjacent vertebra (°) | |||
Preoperative | Postoperative | Preoperative | Postoperative | Preoperative | Postoperative | |
Control group | 5.26 ± 0.72 | 7.24 ± 0.78 | 10.32 ± 2.64 | 15.28 ± 4.43 | 10.29 ± 2.56 | 15.37 ± 4.21 |
Observation group | 5.31 ± 0.75 | 7.68 ± 0.85 | 10.38 ± 2.65 | 11.74 ± 2.96 | 10.33 ± 2.62 | 12.18 ± 3.15 |
t | 0.323 | 2.559 | 0.108 | 4.457 | 0.073 | 4.070 |
P value | > 0.05 | < 0.05 | > 0.05 | < 0.05 | > 0.05 | < 0.05 |
- Citation: Zhang B, Jiang YZ, Song QP, An Y. Outcomes of cervical degenerative disc disease treated by anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking fusion cage. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(15): 4776-4784
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i15/4776.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i15.4776