Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2022; 10(15): 4776-4784
Published online May 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i15.4776
Published online May 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i15.4776
Table 2 Comparison of pain and cervical spine function between the two groups (n = 45)
Group | VAS score | JOA score | NDI (%) | |||
Preoperative | Postoperative | Preoperative | Postoperative | Preoperative | Postoperative | |
Control group | 5.42 ± 1.06 | 1.95 ± 0.48 | 8.94 ± 2.18 | 13.26 ± 3.35 | 33.82 ± 6.43 | 14.56 ± 2.84 |
Observation group | 5.38 ± 1.05 | 1.03 ± 0.29 | 9.03 ± 2.19 | 18.71 ± 3.62 | 33.79 ± 6.36 | 8.92 ± 2.33 |
t | 0.180 | 11.005 | 0.195 | 7.412 | 0.022 | 10.299 |
P value | > 0.05 | < 0.05 | > 0.05 | < 0.05 | > 0.05 | > 0.05 |
- Citation: Zhang B, Jiang YZ, Song QP, An Y. Outcomes of cervical degenerative disc disease treated by anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking fusion cage. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(15): 4776-4784
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i15/4776.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i15.4776