Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2022; 10(13): 4050-4063
Published online May 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4050
Table 3 Comparison of left ventricular volume and left ventricular ejection fraction measured by M-mode echocardiography, Biplane Simpson, and HeartModel methods against advanced cardiac three-dimensional quantification
Parameter
rs
Bias ± LOA
Relative bias (%)
Percentage error (%)
Teichholz (n = 150)
LVEDV (mL)0.8237.3 ± 82.735.166.1
LVESV (mL)0.9120.0 ± 56.235.885.2
LVEF (%)0.891.5 ± 12.33.023.5
Biplane Simpson (n = 150)
LVEDV (mL)0.874.6 ± 46.84.343.0
LVESV (mL)0.941.9 ± 26.93.447.2
LVEF (%)0.911.4 ± 11.82.722.6
LAESV (mL)0.930.7 ± 23.71.239.6
3DQ (n = 150)
LVEDV (mL)0.962.4 ± 21.32.319.8
LVESV (mL)0.981.3 ± 11.22.319.8
LVEF (%)0.980.1 ± 5.20.210.1
HM-NE (n = 150)
LVEDV (mL)0.8533.4 ± 56.431.445.8
LVESV (mL)0.9015.7 ± 33.028.051.6
LVEF (%)0.85-0.2 ± 16.8-0.4-32.5
LAESV (mL)0.9310.2 ± 30.317.247.0
HM-RE (n = 150)
LVEDV (mL)0.9128.1 ± 47.626.439.5
LVESV (mL)0.9314.92 ± 30.926.648.7
LVEF (%)0.95-0.0 ± 9.8-0.0-19.0
LAESV (mL)0.958.1 ± 23.713.737.4