Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2022; 10(13): 4050-4063
Published online May 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4050
Table 1 Comparison of left ventricular volume and left ventricular ejection fraction measured by the different transthoracic echocardiographic methods in 4 groups (mean ± SD)
Parameter
3DQA
Teichholz
Biplane Simpson
3DQ
HM-NE
HM-RE
Group A (control group, n = 42)
LVEDV (mL)77.5 ± 13.782.5 ± 11.6a70.6 ± 10.9a77.1 ± 15.491.0 ± 17.5a86.3 ± 15.9a
LVESV (mL)25.7 ± 5.327.5 ± 4.924.2 ± 4.5a26.3 ± 6.731.5 ± 6.9a29.6 ± 6.4a
LVEF (%)66.6 ± 4.366.5 ± 4.265.6 ± 3.4a65.8 ± 4.0a65.2 ± 4.2a65.5 ± 3.9a
LAESV (mL)36.8 ± 9.6NS35.2 ± 9.9aNS41.2 ± 10.5a39.8 ± 10.6a
Group B (DCM, n = 35)
LVEDV (mL)147.4 ± 34.7205.7 ± 52.7a162.7 ± 46.6a154.3 ± 38.0a187.5 ± 52.3a186.1 ± 45.8a
LVESV (mL)96.6 ± 30.0132.4 ± 40.4a103.1 ± 36.199.7 ± 32.3a115.6 ± 39.0a119.6 ± 40.4a
LVEF (%)35.1 ± 9.536.2 ± 7.937.3 ± 8.835.9 ± 9.337.9 ± 11.135.9 ± 9.4
LAESV (mL)60.4 ± 26.5NS62.9 ± 33.0NS68.0 ± 34.6a69.4 ± 33.1a
Group C (SWMA, n = 41)
LVEDV (mL)121.4 ± 50.8183.8 ± 73.1a135.1 ± 51.7a124.7 ± 51.9a170.3 ± 57.7a162.5 ± 56.9a
LVESV (mL)74.2 ± 35.6111.6 ± 56.4a79.6 ± 37.275.4 ± 35.394.5 ± 40.4a95.5 ± 40.2a
LVEF (%)40.0 ± 10.241.5 ± 10.142.4 ± 10.240.6 ± 8.445.3 ± 11.8a42.5 ± 8.6a
LAESV (mL)73.2 ± 51.0NS74.4 ± 53.5NS84.9 ± 57.4a82.4 ± 57.8a
Group D (HCM, n = 32)
LVEDV (mL)80.0 ± 21.5104.8 ± 32.2a75.7 ± 21.680.6 ± 22.4112.6 ± 27.1a105.6 ± 31.6a
LVESV (mL)27.8 ± 8.732.3 ± 12.324.7 ± 9.5a28.3 ± 9.547.1 ± 14.8a40.1 ± 14.0a
LVEF (%)65.1 ± 5.669.4 ± 6.4a67.6 ± 7.1a65.0 ± 5.758.3 ± 7.5a62.1 ± 5.6a
LAESV (mL)70.4 ± 30.5NS71.5 ± 38.5NS89.3 ± 45.3a83.1 ± 42.1a