Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2022; 10(13): 4042-4049
Published online May 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4042
Published online May 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4042
Time | Groups | Cases | NPY (g/L) | PGE2 (ng/L) | 5-HT (ng/L) |
Before the operation | Study group | 48 | 109.79 ± 13.46 | 269.54 ± 37.34 | 151.70 ± 18.86 |
Control group | 48 | 113.29 ± 15.01 | 273.91 ± 40.04 | 148.85 ± 20.45 | |
t | 1.203 | 0.553 | 0.710 | ||
P | 0.232 | 0.582 | 0.480 | ||
After the operation | Study group | 48 | 153.13 ± 16.91 | 313.76 ± 40.64 | 218.78 ± 22.65 |
Controlgroup | 48 | 178.68 ± 20.51 | 369.78 ± 44.37 | 267.64 ± 30.74 | |
t | 6.659 | 6.450 | 8.865 | ||
P | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
- Citation: He LH, Yang B, Su XQ, Zhou Y, Zhang Z. Comparison of clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(13): 4042-4049
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i13/4042.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4042