Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 26, 2022; 10(12): 3764-3772
Published online Apr 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i12.3764
Published online Apr 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i12.3764
Table 2 Comparison of related indexes during anesthesia between the two groups
| Groups | WAA group (n = 91) | CON group (n = 90) | t value/χ2 value | P value |
| Propofol induction dose (mg) | 80.0 (20) | 115.0 (20) | -9.35 | < 0.0001 |
| Total propofol dose (mg) | 110.0 (40) | 157.5 (70) | -7.15 | < 0.0001 |
| Incidence of hypoxemia, n (%) | 2 (2.2) | 10 (11.1) | 4.46 | 0.035 |
| Incidence of hypotension, n (%) | 3 (3.3) | 14 (15.6) | 7.99 | 0.005 |
| Abdominal distention, n (%) | 8 (8.8) | 26 (28.9) | 11.98 | 0.001 |
| Nausea and vomiting, n (%) | 3 (3.3) | 5 (5.6) | 0.14 | 0.46 |
- Citation: He T, Liu C, Lu ZX, Kong LL, Li Y, Xu Z, Dong YJ, Hao W. Effect of wrist-ankle acupuncture on propofol dosage during painless colonoscopy: A randomized controlled prospective study. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(12): 3764-3772
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i12/3764.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i12.3764