Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 6, 2022; 10(10): 3121-3130
Published online Apr 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i10.3121
Table 3 The characteristic of four studies compared ALHA ligation and ALHA preservation group

ALHAWaki et al[25], ALHA
Ang et al[29], RLHA
AcLHA                                  
Shinohara et al[17], ALHA            
Kim et al[30], ALHA

Divided (n = 18)
Preserved (n = 37)
P value
Divided (n = 17)
Preserved (n = 114)
P value
Divided (n = 52)
Preserved (n = 21)
P value
Divided (n = 23)
Preserved (n = 27)
P value
Divided (n = 116)
Preserved (n = 34)
P value
Operation time (min)285 (171-490)301 (173-476)0.36222 ± 55243 ± 730.158216 ± 49221 ± 590.727293 ± 19223 ± 180.0141151.5 (84-315)177.5 (118-329)0.084
EBL (mL)10 (0-155)18 (0-308)0.427102 ± 93134 ± 1260.316108 ± 93129 ± 1260.429450 ± 44269 ± 430.0051100 (20-1000)100 (30-200)0.791
RLS (n)59 (34-64)36.5 (21-53)0.15254 ± 5.738 ± 3.50.018137 (16-87)33 (16-66)0.207
PHS (d)10 (7-38)9 (7-21)0.11311.8 ± 8.09.7 ± 7.50.29510.9 ± 16.711.9 ± 9.20.804------
Complications, n (%)6 (33.3%)6 (16.2%)0.1773 (17.6%)16 (14%)0.7138 (15.4%)6 (28.6%)0.207------
PLECTPOD1, POD3< 0.0011AST POD2, ALT (POD2, POD5)< 0.0011, (< 0.0011, 0.0461)--POD1, POD3< 0.011AST POD1; ALT (POD1, POD5)0.0091; (0.0031, 0.0071)