Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 6, 2022; 10(10): 3069-3077
Published online Apr 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i10.3069
Table 1 Comparisons in baseline characteristics between the two groups, n (%)
Baseline data
The intervention group (n = 60)
The routine group (n = 60)
t/χ2 value
P value
Age (yr)71.4 ± 6.170.9 ± 5.20.4830.630
Height (cm)166.8 ± 4.1165.5 ± 5.01.5570.122
Weight (kg)64.9 ± 5.866.3 ± 5.2-1.3920.167
Interval between fracture and operation (d)3.1 ± 1.33.3 ± 1.1-0.9100.365
Gender0.5560.456
Male34 (56.67)38 (63.33)
Female26 (43.33)22 (36.67)
Affected side distribution0.5360.464
Left side30 (50.00)34 (56.67)
Right side30 (50.00)26 (43.33)
Hypertension2.596 0.107
Yes11 (18.33)5 (8.33)
No49 (81.67)55 (91.67)
Diabetes0.5360.464
Yes3 (5.00)5 (8.33)
No57 (95.00)55 (91.67)
Reason of fracture2.0040.157
Traffic accident14 (23.33)8 (13.33)
Self fall injury46 (76.67)52 (86.67)