Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 7, 2022; 10(1): 35-42
Published online Jan 7, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i1.35
Published online Jan 7, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i1.35
Table 3 Comparison of blood flow classification, n (%)
| Timing | Group | Number of cases | Grade 0 | Grade I | Grade II | Grade III |
| Before treatment | Study group | 47 | 25 (53.19) | 12 (25.53) | 7 (14.89) | 3 (6.38) |
| Control group | 47 | 23 (48.94) | 15 (31.91) | 5 (10.64) | 4 (8.51) | |
| χ2 value | 0.170 | 0.468 | 0.382 | 0.000 | ||
| P value | 0.680 | 0.494 | 0.536 | 1.000 | ||
| After treatment | Study group | 47 | 36 (76.60) | 5 (10.64) | 5 (10.64) | 1 (2.13) |
| Control group | 47 | 27 (57.45) | 15 (31.91) | 3 (6.38) | 2 (4.26) | |
| χ2 value | 3.899 | 6.351 | 0.545 | 0.000 | ||
| P value | 0.048 | 0.012 | 0.460 | 1.000 |
- Citation: Huang YM, Zhuang Y, Tan ZM. Changes in rheumatoid arthritis under ultrasound before and after sinomenine injection. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(1): 35-42
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i1/35.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i1.35