Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 7, 2022; 10(1): 217-226
Published online Jan 7, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i1.217
Published online Jan 7, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i1.217
Table 2 Treatment options and patient outcomes (n = 24)
Measure | Value1 |
Endovascular modality2 | |
Thrombectomy | 12 (50.0) |
Thrombolysis | 10 (41.7) |
Stent placement | 9 (37.5) |
TIPS | 6 (25.0) |
Balloon angioplasty | 4 (16.7) |
Technical success outcome3 | 18 (75.0) |
Complete | 11 (61.1) |
Partial | 7 (38.9) |
Clinical outcome | |
Resolution | 11 (45.8) |
Partial improvement | 9 (37.5) |
Not changed | 3 (12.5) |
Got worse | 1 (4.2) |
Clavien-Dindo classification4 | |
Grade I | 4 (16.7) |
Grade II | 5 (20.8) |
Grade III | 1 (4.2) |
Grade IV | 0 (0.0) |
Grade V | 1 (4.2) |
Intestinal resection | 1 (4.2) |
In-hospital time, d | 12 (1-68) |
Readmission | 1 (4.2) |
Follow-up duration, mo | 23 (1-145) |
- Citation: Alnahhal K, Toskich BB, Nussbaum S, Li Z, Erben Y, Hakaim AG, Farres H. Superior mesenteric venous thrombosis: Endovascular management and outcomes. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(1): 217-226
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i1/217.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i1.217