Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2021; 9(33): 10222-10232
Published online Nov 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i33.10222
Figure 1
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 1  Flow diagram of this meta-analysis.
Figure 2
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 2 Funnel plot for the association between the presence of ground glass opacity on computed tomography and overall survival of stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients. HR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 3
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 3 Funnel plot of subgroup analysis based on the ratio of ground glass opacity for the association between the presence of ground glass opacity on computed tomography and overall survival in stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients. HR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 4
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 4 Funnel plot for the association between the presence of ground glass opacity on computed tomography and disease-free survival of stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients. HR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 5
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 5 Funnel plot of subgroup analysis based on the ratio of ground glass opacity for the association between the presence of ground glass opacity on computed tomography and disease-free survival in stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients. HR: Hazard ratio; Confidence interval.
Figure 6
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 6 Sensitivity analysis. A: The association between the presence of ground glass opacity on computed tomography and overall survival in stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients; B: The association between the presence of ground glass opacity on computed tomography and disease-free survival in stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients. CI: Confidence interval.