Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Methodol. Nov 14, 2019; 9(3): 32-43
Published online Nov 14, 2019. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v9.i3.32
Published online Nov 14, 2019. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v9.i3.32
Sl No. | Unpaired t-test | P value | R value | Significance |
1 | Method 1 vs Method 2 | 0.908 | 0.0003 | NS |
2 | Method 1 vs Method 3 | < 0.0001 | 0.401 | c |
3 | Method 1 vs Method 4 | 0.0017 | 0.23 | b |
4 | Method 1 vs Method 5 | 0.524 | 0.01 | NS |
5 | Method 2 vs Method 3 | < 0.0001 | 0.418 | c |
6 | Method 2 vs Method 4 | 0.0011 | 0.248 | b |
7 | Method 2 vs Method 5 | 0.393 | 0.019 | NS |
8 | Method 3 vs Method 4 | 0.13 | 0.059 | NS |
9 | Method 3 vs Method 5 | < 0.0001 | 0.366 | c |
10 | Method 4 vs Method 5 | 0.004 | 0.192 | b |
- Citation: Ramesh PS, Madegowda V, Kumar S, Narasimha S, S R P, Manoli NN, Devegowda D. DNA extraction from archived hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue slides for downstream molecular analysis. World J Methodol 2019; 9(3): 32-43
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v9/i3/32.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v9.i3.32