Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Methodol. Dec 26, 2015; 5(4): 212-215
Published online Dec 26, 2015. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v5.i4.212
Published online Dec 26, 2015. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v5.i4.212
Drug | Coagulation test | Pros | Cons |
Dabigatran | aPTT | Highly available | Do not reflect the intensity of coagulation Low specificity |
TT | Highly available | It only determines the effect of dabigatran but lacks specificity | |
dTT | Very accurate and precise to estimates plasma concentrations of dabigatran | Requires specific calibrators and controls in specialized laboratories with trained personal Low specificity | |
ECT | Requires specific calibrators and controls in specialized laboratories with trained personal Limited standardization and validation required Low specificity Interlot variability reported | ||
ECA | Very accurate and precise to estimates plasma concentrations of dabigatran | Requires specific calibrators and controls in specialized laboratories with trained personal Low specificity | |
DRVV-T | Requires specific calibrators and controls in specialized laboratories with trained personal Low specificity | ||
Rivaroxaban | PT | Highly available | Do not reflect the intensity of coagulation Low specificity |
Rivaroxaban and Apixaban | Chromogenic anti-Xa assays | Very accurate and precise to estimates plasma concentrations of dabigatran | Requires specific calibrators and controls in specialized laboratories with trained personal |
DRVV-T | Requires specific calibrators and controls in specialized laboratories with trained personal Low specificity |
- Citation: Ramos-Esquivel A. Monitoring anticoagulant therapy with new oral agents. World J Methodol 2015; 5(4): 212-215
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v5/i4/212.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v5.i4.212