Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Methodol. Jun 26, 2014; 4(2): 46-58
Published online Jun 26, 2014. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v4.i2.46
Table 1 Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameter correlations with physiological parameters at breast tissue
Ref.Correlation
Direction of correlationP
Physiological parameterDCE-MRI measurement
Buadu et al[76], 1996MVDAmplitude+< 0.01
Slope maximum+< 0.01
Enhancement Maximum time-< 0.01
Tumor size..NS
Stomper et al[77], 1996DNA S-phase percentageSignal enhancement amplitude..NS
Signal enhancement rate..NS
Signal washout..NS
Hulka et al[78], 1997Tumor gradeRSI+< 0.01
Matsubayashi et al[79], 2000Peripheral-central MVD ratioEarly rim enhancement+0.048
Peripheral-central fibrosis ratioEarly rim enhancement-< 0.01
Central-peripheral fibrosis ratioDelayed rim+0.013
Gianfelice et al[80], 2003Residue tumor percentage after MRIgFUSISI+NR
MDF+NR
PEI+NR
Su et al[81], 2003VEGFApparent Vb..NS
In-flux rate and distribution volume in interstitial space (VeK1)..NS
Out-flux rate (K2)..NS