Comparison of standard vs auxiliary (contrast or elastography) endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration/biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions: A meta-analysis

Table 2 Summary of results of diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis

Parameters	Standard EUS-FNA/B		EUS-FNA/B with auxiliary techniques
	Values with 95%CI	Heterogeneity (I2)	Values with 95%CI	Heterogeneity (I2)
Sensitivity	0.82 (0.79-0.85)	89.8%	0.86 (0.83-0.89)	73.6%
Specificity	1.00 (0.96-1.00)	0.0%	1.00 (0.94-1.00)	2.7%
Positive LR	14.42 (5.64-36.90)	0.0%	11.11 (4.30-28.71)	21.6%
Negative LR	0.19 (0.13-0.30)	82.5%	0.17 (0.13-0.22)	40.4%
DOR	105.51 (36.38-305.99)	0.0%	126.87 (44.43-362.28)	0.0%
AUROC	0.97 (0.95-0.98)	-	0.96 (0.94-0.98)	-

LR: Likelihood ratio; DOR: Diagnostic odds ratio; AUROC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; EUS-FNA/B: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy.