Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Methodol. Sep 20, 2025; 15(3): 97415
Published online Sep 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i3.97415
Published online Sep 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i3.97415
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis, mean ± SD/median (range/25th-75th percentiles)
Ref. | Country | Study design | Arm | Number of patients | Age | Lesion size, in mm | Lesion location (H/U-B/T) | Contrast | Needle | Suction | Number of passes | ROSE |
Hou et al[17] | China | Retrospective | CEH-EUS FNA | 58 | 55.1 ± 11.7 | 38 ± 12 | 35/23 | SonoVue | 22-G | - | 3.7 ± 0.9 | No |
EUS-FNA | 105 | 56.2 ± 12.5 | 39 ± 8.0 | 65/40 | - | 3.6 ± 0.8 | ||||||
Seicean et al[18] | Romania | Prospective, cross-over | CEH-EUS FNA | 51 | 64 (39-83) | 35 | 31/10 | SonoVue | 22-G | - | 2 | No |
EUS-FNA | - | 2 | ||||||||||
Sugimoto et al[19] | Japan | RCT | CEH-EUS FNA | 20 | 69.5 ± 10.5 | 25.0 ± 8.0 | 13/7 | Sonazoid | 22-G | DS | 1-5 | Yes |
EUS-FNA | 20 | 67.1 ± 9.9 | 26.5 ± 9.2 | 13/7 | - | 22-G or 25-G | 1-5 | |||||
Facciorusso et al[20] | Italy | Retrospective | CEH-EUS FNA | 103 | 66 ± 6 | 32 ± 11 | 71/32 | SonoVue | 22-G | DS | 2.4 ± 0.6 | No |
EUS-FNA | 103 | 66 ± 8 | 32 ± 10 | 71/32 | - | 2.7 ± 0.8 | ||||||
Itonaga et al[21] | Japan | Prospective, cross-over | CEH-EUS FNA | 93 | 72.5 (34–89) | 25.2 (12-56) | 55/38 | Sonazoid | 22-G | DS | 2.6 (2-5) | No |
EUS-FNA | - | |||||||||||
Seicean et al[22] | Romania | RCT, cross-over | CEH-EUS FNA | 148 | 64.5 (62.6 – 66.3) | 30 (20.8- 35) | 103/45 | SonoVue | 22-G | - | 1 | No |
EUS-FNA | - | 1 | ||||||||||
Cho et al[23] | South Korea | RCT | CEH-EUS FNA/B | 120 | 66.3 ± 11.8 | 30.9 ± 2.1 | 54/66 | SonoVue | 19- to 25-G | DS | 1-5 | No |
EUS-FNA/B | 120 | 68.3 ± 11.9 | 33.1 ± 16.4 | 60/60 | - | 1-5 | ||||||
Gheorghiu et al[24] | Romania | Prospective, cross-over | RTE-EUS FNA | 60 | 66.4 ± 10.0 | 30 (29.5 -35) | 44/16 | - | 22-G | No | 1 | No |
EUS-FNA | - | 1 | ||||||||||
Lai et al[25] | Taiwan | Retrospective | CEH-EUS FNB | 48 | 63.6 ± 12.6 | 29.5 ± 11.5 | 29/11/8 | Sonazoid | 22-G | SSP | 2.2 ± 0.7 | No |
EUS-FNB | 85 | 34.8 ± 18.2 | 39/36/10 | - | 3.6 ± 1.2 | |||||||
Kuo et al[26] | Taiwan | RCT | CEH-EUS FNB | 59 | 64.7 ± 11.6 | 37.5 (28.8-45.9) | 30/29 | Sonazoid | 22-G | No | 1-6 | Yes |
EUS-FNB | 59 | 64.1 ± 12.6 | 37.5 (30.6-46.2) | 34/25 | - | 1-6 |
- Citation: Rath MM, Anirvan P, Varghese J, Tripathy TP, Patel RK, Panigrahi MK, Giri S. Comparison of standard vs auxiliary (contrast or elastography) endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration/biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions: A meta-analysis. World J Methodol 2025; 15(3): 97415
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v15/i3/97415.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v15.i3.97415