Comparative efficacy of hyperbaric bupivacaine vs hyperbaric ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A meta-analysis

doi:10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.99300

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 15, Issue 2

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (2379)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-5) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

1461

Figures (1-5)

291

Tables (1-4)

269

Sum=2085

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

Download

153

Sum=198

Jun 20, 2025 (publication date) through Apr 15, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Methodology

ISSN

2222-0682

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Methodol. Jun 20, 2025; 15(2): 99300
Published online Jun 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.99300

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Forest chart and continuous variables. A: Forest chart, onset of sensory blockade to maximal level; B: Forest chart, time to complete motor blockade; C: Forest chart, time for sensory blockade regression; D: Forest chart, time to recover from motor blockade; E: Forest chart, duration of analgesia.

Citation: Anand R, Nag DS, Patel R, Sharma P, Uppalapati VK, Singh UK. Comparative efficacy of hyperbaric bupivacaine vs hyperbaric ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A meta-analysis. World J Methodol 2025; 15(2): 99300
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v15/i2/99300.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.99300