Comparative efficacy of hyperbaric bupivacaine vs hyperbaric ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A meta-analysis

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 15, Issue 2

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

679

Figures (1-5)

150

Tables (1-4)

122

Sum=991

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

Download

Sum=78

Jun 20, 2025 (publication date) through Jan 29, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Methodology

ISSN

2222-0682

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Methodol. Jun 20, 2025; 15(2): 99300
Published online Jun 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.99300

Table 4 Eggers test results

Parameter	Publication bias	Publication bias (Egger's test)
Onset of sensory blockade	Yes	Yes (t = 4.914, P = 0.003)
Onset of complete motor block	No	No (t = 2.02, P = 0.099)
Sensory blockade regression	Yes	Yes (t = -3.199, P = 0.019)
Motor blockade recovery	Yes	Yes (t = -2.754, P = 0.033)
Duration of analgesia	No	No (t = -0.345, P = 0.744)

Citation: Anand R, Nag DS, Patel R, Sharma P, Uppalapati VK, Singh UK. Comparative efficacy of hyperbaric bupivacaine vs hyperbaric ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A meta-analysis. World J Methodol 2025; 15(2): 99300
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v15/i2/99300.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.99300