Comparative efficacy of hyperbaric bupivacaine vs hyperbaric ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A meta-analysis

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 15, Issue 2

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

396

Figures (1-5)

Tables (1-4)

Sum=578

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

Download

Sum=43

Jun 20, 2025 (publication date) through Dec 26, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Methodology

ISSN

2222-0682

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Methodol. Jun 20, 2025; 15(2): 99300
Published online Jun 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.99300

Table 3 Side effects profile evaluation

Parameter	Risk ratio	95%CI	P value	Heterogeneity (I²)	Interpretation
Hypotension	0.86	0.72-1.03	0.58	0	No significant difference was observed in hypotension risk
Nausea and Vomiting	0.85	0.58-1.23	0.86	0	No significant difference was observed in nausea and vomiting risk
Shivering	0.81	0.45-1.45	0.58	0	No significant difference was observed in shivering risk

Citation: Anand R, Nag DS, Patel R, Sharma P, Uppalapati VK, Singh UK. Comparative efficacy of hyperbaric bupivacaine vs hyperbaric ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A meta-analysis. World J Methodol 2025; 15(2): 99300
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v15/i2/99300.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.99300