Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Methodol. Jun 20, 2025; 15(2): 99300
Published online Jun 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.99300
Published online Jun 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.99300
Parameter | Standardized mean difference | 95%CI | P value | I² | Interpretation |
Onset of sensory blockade | 1.07 | -0.73 to 2.87 | 0.2 | 0.95 | Statistically insignificant. High heterogeneity. Ropivacaine group is comparable to bupivacaine |
Onset of complete motor block | 0.91 | 0.07-1.74 | < 0.05 | 0.92 | Significant difference. High heterogeneity. Bupivacaine is faster in onset than ropivacaine |
Sensory blockade regression | -0.92 | -1.81 to -0.03 | < 0.05 | 0.93 | Significant difference. High heterogeneity. Regression is faster with ropivacaine |
Motor blockade recovery | -1.24 | -2.15 to -0.32 | < 0.05 | 0.94 | Significant difference. High heterogeneity. Recovery is faster with ropivacaine |
Duration of analgesia | -0.68 | -1.18 to -0.19 | < 0.05 | 0.79 | Significant difference. High heterogeneity. Duration of analgesia is longer with bupivacaine |
- Citation: Anand R, Nag DS, Patel R, Sharma P, Uppalapati VK, Singh UK. Comparative efficacy of hyperbaric bupivacaine vs hyperbaric ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A meta-analysis. World J Methodol 2025; 15(2): 99300
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v15/i2/99300.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.99300