Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Methodol. Jun 20, 2025; 15(2): 99300
Published online Jun 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.99300
Published online Jun 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.99300
Ref. | Type | Blinding | Randomisation | Sample size | Hyperbaric drug concentration | Dose (mg) | |||
R | B | R | B | R | B | ||||
Kiran et al[18], 2023 | RCT | Double | Unclear | 30 | 30 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 15 | 10 |
Kasza et al[19],2006 | RCT | Single | Random allocation | 36 | 39 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 15 | 10 |
Lunia et al[20], 2023 | RCT | Double | Unclear | 43 | 43 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 15 | 10 |
Shah et al[21], 2023 | RCT | Double | Unclear | 40 | 40 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 15 | 10 |
Chung et al[22], 2001 | RCT | Double | Random number table | 30 | 30 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 18 | 12 |
Subba et al[23], 2019 | RCT | Single | Random number table | 30 | 30 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 15 | 12.5 |
Modi et al[24], 2017 | RCT | Single | Random number table | 40 | 40 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 15 | 10 |
Srivastava et al[25], 2012 | RCT | Double | Sealed envelop | 39 | 41 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 15 | 11 |
- Citation: Anand R, Nag DS, Patel R, Sharma P, Uppalapati VK, Singh UK. Comparative efficacy of hyperbaric bupivacaine vs hyperbaric ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: A meta-analysis. World J Methodol 2025; 15(2): 99300
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v15/i2/99300.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.99300