Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Methodol. Jun 20, 2025; 15(2): 95966
Published online Jun 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.95966
Published online Jun 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.95966
Software | Free version | Paid pricing | Ease of use | Scientific focus | Key strengths | Key limitations |
Canva | Yes | $12.99/month (Pro) | Very easy | No | Large template library, beginner-friendly | Lacks scientific icons, watermark on free plan |
BioRender | Yes | $9/month (Academic Basic), $35/month (premium) | Easy | Yes | Extensive scientific icon library, designed for life sciences | Watermark in free version, limited export |
Inkscape | Yes | Free | Moderate | No | Powerful vector design tool, open-source | Steeper learning curve, no scientific templates |
Adobe Illustrator | No | $20.99/month (Academic) | Difficult | No | Professional-quality designs, unmatched customization | Expensive, requires design experience |
Microsoft PowerPoint | No | Part of Office 365 ($69.99/year) | Very easy | No | Widely used, familiar interface | Limited graphic design capabilities |
Mind the Graph | Yes | Starts at $5/month | Easy | Yes | Affordable, designed for researchers | Limited icon library compared to BioRender |
GIMP | Yes | Free | Difficult | No | Free, full-featured image editor | More suited for image editing than vector-based abstracts |
Smart Servier Medical Art | Yes | Free | Very easy | Yes | Free, high-quality medical and biological illustrations | Limited customization options |
- Citation: Jeyaraman N, Jeyaraman M, Ramasubramanian S, Balaji S, Nallakumarasamy A. Visualizing medicine: The case for implementing graphical abstracts in clinical reporting. World J Methodol 2025; 15(2): 95966
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v15/i2/95966.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.95966