Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Methodol. Dec 20, 2023; 13(5): 439-445
Published online Dec 20, 2023. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i5.439
Published online Dec 20, 2023. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i5.439
Readability metric | Overall mean ± SD (range) | First page mean ± SD (range) | Percentage mean difference | P value |
Flesch reading ease | 55.3970 ± 12.7618 (23.2-86.1) | 55.3290 ± 15.9812 (9.9-87.4) | 2.32 | 0.553 |
Flesch-kincaid | 10.1450 ± 2.7082 (5.0-20.1) | 10.3840 ± 3.2056 (4.9-18.9) | 0.47 | 0.915 |
Gunning fog | 12.7830 ± 2.8099 (8.2-23.5) | 12.4210 ± 3.1772 (7.6-20.7) | 3.86 | 0.287 |
SMOG | 9.3530 ± 1.9114 (5.6-15.8) | 9.3000 ± 2.3224 (5.1-16.3) | 2.27 | 0.523 |
Coleman-liau index | 12.2460 ± 1.4778 (7.5-16.1) | 11.9970 ± 2.2096 (8-19) | 4.64 | 0.41 |
Automated readability | 10.2340 ± 3.0205 (4.6-22.0) | 10.5680 ± 3.6182 (3.8-19.2) | 1.05 | 0.824 |
Average grade level | 10.95230 ± 2.27862 (6.18-18.88) | 10.93420 ± 2.73413 (6.22-18.48) | 0.09 | 0.888 |
- Citation: Al-Kharouf KFK, Khan FI, Robertson GA. Assessing the readability of online information about jones fracture. World J Methodol 2023; 13(5): 439-445
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v13/i5/439.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v13.i5.439