Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Methodol. Sep 20, 2023; 13(4): 179-193
Published online Sep 20, 2023. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i4.179
Published online Sep 20, 2023. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i4.179
Ref. | Study population | Intervention | Study design | Sample size, n | Study conclusion |
Poynard et al[70], 1991 | LC patients with oesophageal varices | Propranolol, nadolol vs placebo | Meta-analysis of 4 RCTs | 589 | Both propranolol and nadolol were effective in preventing first VH and reducing the mortality associated with VH |
Tripathi et al[71], 2009 | LC patients with grade II or more varices | Carvedilol vs EVL | RCT | 152 | On intention-to-treat analysis, carvedilol had lower rates of the first VH compared to EVL (10% vs 23%) |
Gluud et al[69], 2012 | LC patients with high-risk varices without prior VH | NSBBs vs EVL | Meta-analysis of 19 RCTs | 1504 | Both EVL and NSBB reduced VH (RR: 0.69 and 0.67) without difference in mortality rates |
Sinagra et al[75], 2014 | LC patients with PHT | Carvedilol vs propranolol | Meta-analysis of 5 studies | 175 | Carvedilol reduced PHT significantly more than propranolol |
Bhardwaj et al[76], 2017 | LC patients with small varices | Carvedilol vs placebo | RCT | 140 | Carvedilol is safe and effective in delaying the progression of small to large oesophageal varices in LC patients |
Zacharias et al[77], 2018 | Adults with LC and varices | NSBBs | Meta-analysis of 10 RCTs | 810 | Carvedilol was more effective at reducing the HVPG. However, it was not better than traditional NSBBs with regard to the mortality, VH, or adverse events |
Malandris et al[72], 2019 | LC patients requiring primary or secondary prevention of VH | Carvedilol, NSBBS, EVL | Meta-analysis of 13 RCTs | 1598 | Carvedilol was as efficacious and safe as standard-of-care interventions for the primary and secondary prevention of VH. Also, carvedilol was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to EVL |
Sharma et al[73], 2019 | LC patients with large oesophageal varices and no prior history of VH | NSBB, isosorbide-mononitrate, carvedilol, and EVL alone or in combination | Meta-analysis of 32 RCTs | 3362 | NSBB monotherapy decreased all-cause mortality and the risk of first VH. Additionally, NSBB carried a lower risk of serious complications compared with EVL |
Villanueva et al[22], 2019 | CLC patients and CSPH | Propranolol, carvedilol vs placebo | RCT | 201 | Long-term treatment with β blockers could increase decompensation-free survival in patients with CLC with CSPH, mainly by reducing the incidence of ascites |
Villanueva et al[78], 2022 | LC patients with CSPH | Carvedilol vs EVL/no treatment | Meta-analysis of 4 RCTs | 352 | Long-term carvedilol therapy reduced decompensation and significantly improved survival |
- Citation: Kumar R, Kumar S, Prakash SS. Compensated liver cirrhosis: Natural course and disease-modifying strategies. World J Methodol 2023; 13(4): 179-193
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v13/i4/179.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v13.i4.179