Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Methodol. Sep 20, 2023; 13(4): 166-169
Published online Sep 20, 2023. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i4.166
Published online Sep 20, 2023. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i4.166
Methodology | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Self-reporting, structured interviews and questionnaires | Online surveys possible | Interviewer dependent |
User friendly | Participant motivation | |
Therapeutic alliance | Low response rate | |
Culturally shaped | Risk of retraumatization | |
Standardizing of results | ||
Quantifiable | ||
Hypnosis and psychodynamic/psychoanalytical approach | Recall of suppressed memories | Mnestic lacunae |
Recollections of remote traumas and of adverse childhood experiences | Confabulations | |
Person centered | Inconsistent statements | |
Potentially of treatment value | Potential for false memories | |
Exploring the subconscious | Unsuitable for psychotic patients | |
MRI (functional neuro-imaging) | Objective data/findings | Methodology still not well standardized |
Reproducible | Ethnic and age-related changes to be considered | |
Images availability and storage of high quality | Relatively costly |
- Citation: Vyshka G, Elezi F, Mana T. Importance of methodological considerations in documenting psychological trauma. World J Methodol 2023; 13(4): 166-169
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v13/i4/166.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v13.i4.166