Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Methodol. Sep 20, 2022; 12(5): 331-349
Published online Sep 20, 2022. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i5.331
Table 3 Frequency of venous thromboembolic complications in coronavirus disease 2019 patients
Ref.
Proportion
Cumulative incidence
Median follow-up
Patients
Cui et al[59]20/81 (25%)NRNRICU patients
Klok et al[60]68/184 (37%)57% or 49% adjusted for competing risk of death14 dICU patients only.19 PE were limited to subsegmental arteries.65/68 venous events were PE (95.6%)
Poissy et al[61]VTE 22.2% of 54 ICU admitted
Helms et al[44]27/150 (18%)NRNRICU patients with ARDS 25/27 events were PE (92.5%)
Poissy et al[61]PE only 22/107 (20.6%)20.4% calculated at ICU day 156 dICU only
Middeldorp et al[63]Venous thromboembolism 39% of COVID-19 ICU cases 74 patients
Llitjos et al[64]DVT: 18/26 (69%); PE: 6/26 (23%)NRNRICU patients. Systematic ultrasound screening
Léonard-Lorant et al[183]PE only 32/106 (30%)NRNR24/32 (75%) PE-positive patients were in the ICU
Grillet et al[184]PE only 23/100 (23%)NRNRWard: 6/61 (9.8%); ICU: 17/39 (43.6%)
Middeldorp et al[63]33/198 (17%)15% at 7 d; 34% at 14 d5 dWard: 4/123 (3.3%); ICU: 35/75 (47%); 11 (5.4%) clots detected on screening 11/33 events were PE (33%)
Lodigiani et al[185]16/362 (4.4%)21% (time not reported)10 dICU 4/48(8.3%); Ward 12/314 (3.8%)
Thomas et al[186]6/63 (9%)27%8 dICU patients
Cattaneo et al[108]DVT only 0/388 (0%)NRNRNon-ICU Ward 64 patients had screening ultrasound. All negative