Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Methodol. Jul 20, 2022; 12(4): 274-284
Published online Jul 20, 2022. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.274
Published online Jul 20, 2022. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.274
Table 3 Time taken for performing ultrasound
| Patient | Conventional hand-held (min) | Robotic arm (min) |
| 1 | 3 | 17 |
| 2 | 5 | 17 |
| 3 | 5 | 17 |
| 4 | 3 | 15 |
| 6 | 2 | 10 |
| 7 | 4 | 9 |
| 8 | 4 | 8 |
| 9 | 7 | 6 |
| 10 | 4 | 9 |
| 11 | 4 | 6 |
| 12 | 5 | 5 |
| 13 | 6 | 8 |
| 14 | 3 | 8 |
| 15 | 4 | 6 |
| 16 | 3 | 5 |
| 17 | 4 | 4 |
| 18 | 5 | 4 |
| 19 | 3 | 7 |
| 20 | 5 | 6 |
| 21 | 3 | 8 |
- Citation: Chandrashekhara SH, Rangarajan K, Agrawal A, Thulkar S, Gamanagatti S, Raina D, Saha SK, Arora C. Robotic ultrasound: An initial feasibility study. World J Methodol 2022; 12(4): 274-284
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v12/i4/274.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.274