Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Methodol. Jul 20, 2022; 12(4): 274-284
Published online Jul 20, 2022. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.274
Published online Jul 20, 2022. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.274
Table 2 Doctor satisfaction survey, n (%)
| Strongly disagree | Somewhat disagree | Neither disagree nor agree | Somewhat agree | Strongly agree | |
| I could use the system easily | 0 (0) | 5 (23.8) | 1 (4.8) | 15 (71.4) | 0 (0) |
| I have understanding of the working of the system | 0 (0) | 3 (14.3) | 0 (0) | 18 (85.7) | 0 (0) |
| I could learn to use the system with more trials | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 8 (38.1) | 13 (61.9) |
| I would like to use the system over conventional system | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 8(38.1) | 13(61.9) | 0 (0) |
| I feel the system is precise, safe, and effective | 0 (0) | 1 (4.8) | 6 (28.6) | 11 (52.4) | 3 (14.2) |
| In case of errors, I was able to handle them with ease | 0 (0) | 11 (52.4) | 4 (19) | 6 (28.6) | 0 (0) |
| I was not concerned about the safety of the patient during the procedure | 0 (0) | 7 (33.3) | 0 (0) | 13 (61.9) | 1 (4.8) |
| I feel the user interface is useful | 0 (0) | 1 (4.8) | 5 (23.8) | 15 (71.4) | 0 (0) |
| I trust the results of the system | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 4 (19.05) | 13 (61.9) | 4 (19.05) |
| Overall rating | Average: 6.38 |
- Citation: Chandrashekhara SH, Rangarajan K, Agrawal A, Thulkar S, Gamanagatti S, Raina D, Saha SK, Arora C. Robotic ultrasound: An initial feasibility study. World J Methodol 2022; 12(4): 274-284
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v12/i4/274.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.274