Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Methodol. Jul 20, 2022; 12(4): 274-284
Published online Jul 20, 2022. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.274
Published online Jul 20, 2022. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.274
Table 1 Patient/volunteer satisfaction survey, n (%)
| Strongly disagree | Somewhat disagree | Neither disagree nor agree | Somewhat agree | Strongly agree | |
| I was worried to undergo this procedure | 0 (0) | 7 (33.4) | 2 (9.5) | 12 (57.1) | 0 (0) |
| I felt comfortable during the procedure | 0 (0) | 1 (4.8) | 1 (4.8) | 18 (85.6) | 1 (4.8) |
| I felt no difference between this and conventional ultrasound | 0 (0) | 8 (38.1) | 5 (23.8) | 8 (38.1) | 0 (0) |
| I felt comfortable knowing that doctor is controlling the robot | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 13 (61.9) | 8 (38.1) |
| I will trust the results of this technology | 0 (0) | 5 (23.8) | 6 (28.6) | 10 (47.6) | 0 (0) |
| I understand how the procedure took place | 0 (0) | 7 (33.4) | 11 (52.4) | 3 (14.3) | 0 (0) |
| I felt less pressure on my body in comparison to conventional ultrasound | 0 (0) | 7 (33.33) | 7 (33.33) | 7 (33.33) | 0 (0) |
| I would like to use this technology in future | 0 (0) | 2 (9.5) | 4 (19.1) | 12 (57.1) | 3 (14.3) |
| I would recommend this technology to others | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 4 (19.1) | 14 (66.6) | 3 (14.3) |
| Overall rating | Average: 6.2 |
- Citation: Chandrashekhara SH, Rangarajan K, Agrawal A, Thulkar S, Gamanagatti S, Raina D, Saha SK, Arora C. Robotic ultrasound: An initial feasibility study. World J Methodol 2022; 12(4): 274-284
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v12/i4/274.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.274