Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Methodol. Jul 20, 2021; 11(4): 116-129
Published online Jul 20, 2021. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116
Published online Jul 20, 2021. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116
No. | Ref. | Identification of problem area | Selection of panel members | Anonymity of panellist | Controlled feedback | Iterative rounds | Consensus Criteria | Analysis of consensus | Closing criteria | Group stability | Number of rounds | Number of experts |
1 | Vitacca et al[24] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2 | 20 |
2 | Mikuls et al [25] | Yes | Yes | Not clear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2 | 14 |
3 | Greenhalgh et al[26] | Yes | Not clear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not clear | Yes | Yes | No | 4 | 72 |
4 | Lamb et al[27] | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 1 | 13 |
5 | Welsh Surgical Research Initiative (WSRI) Collaborative[28] | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 1 | 339 |
6 | Eibensteiner et al[29] | Yes | Yes | Not clear | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | 4 | 13 |
z | Bhandari et al[30] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2 | 34 |
8 | Guckenberger et al[31] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 3 | 32 |
9 | Aj et al[32] | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 1 | 339 |
10 | Gelfand et al[33] | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2 | 18 |
11 | Allan et al[34] | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | 3 | 213 |
12 | Shanbehzadeh et al[35] | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2 | 40 |
13 | Bergman et al[36] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2 | 21 |
14 | Daigle et al[37] | Yes | Yes | Not clear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2 | 18 |
15 | Sorbello et al[38] | Yes | Not clear | Not clear | Not clear | Not clear | Not clear | Not clear | Not clear | Not clear | - | 0 |
16 | Jheon et al[39] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2 | 26 |
17 | Olmos-Gómez et al[40] | Yes | Yes | Not clear | Not clear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 3 | 441 |
18 | Sawhney et al[41] | Not clear | Not clear | Not clear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Not clear | 3 | 14 |
19 | Sciubba et al[42] | Not clear | Not clear | No | Not clear | Yes | No | Yes | No | Not clear | 3 | 16 |
20 | Errett et al[43] | Not clear | Not clear | Yes | Not clear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 3 | 28 |
21 | Arezzo et al[44] | Yes | Not clear | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 2 | 55 |
22 | Dashash et al[45] | Yes | Not clear | Not clear | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | 3 | 20 |
23 | Ramalho et al[46] | Yes | Not clear | Not clear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not clear | No | 2 | 16 |
24 | Saldarriaga Rivera et al[47] | Yes | No | Not clear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not clear | No | 3 | 11 |
25 | Tchouaket Nguemeleu et al[48] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 2 | 18 |
26 | Santana et al[49] | No | Not clear | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Not clear | 4 | 6 |
27 | Tang et al[50] | Yes | Yes | Not clear | No | Not clear | No | No | No | No | 1 | 83 |
28 | Jiménez-Rodríguez et al[51] | No | Yes | Not clear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 3 | 16 |
29 | Reina Ortiz et al[52] | No | Yes | Not clear | Yes | Yes | No | No | Not clear | No | 2 | 12 |
30 | Douillet et al[53] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not clear | 4 | 51 |
31 | Richez et al[54] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | Not clear | No | 2 | 10 |
32 | Yılmaz Yalçınkaya et al[55] | Yes | Yes | Not clear | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | 1 | 60 |
33 | Tanasijevic et al[56] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 3 | 13 |
34 | Alarcón et al[57] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | 3 | 197 |
- Citation: Nasa P, Jain R, Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World J Methodol 2021; 11(4): 116-129
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v11/i4/116.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116