Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Transl Med. Aug 12, 2014; 3(2): 58-68
Published online Aug 12, 2014. doi: 10.5528/wjtm.v3.i2.58
Table 2 Hypothermic vs normothermic machine perfusion of liver grafts
Hypothermic machine perfusion HMPNormothermic machine perfusion NMP
Temperature 0 °C-4 °CTemperature 37 °C
Logistically easierLogistically demanding
Modest resumption of energy production with low perfusion rate
Improves the state of mitochondria during preservationRecreates the physiological milieu by maintenance of normal temperature
Performed at sub-physiologic pressures[107]Performed at physiological pressures[70,82]
Requires low perfusion rates[108]Requires high perfusion rates[108]
No requirement for a specific oxygen carrier in the perfusate as demand for O2 is low[108]Oxygen is provided by using blood, modified hemoglobin, or using a high oxygen tension in special preservation solutions[70,82,84,88,109]
Less occurrence of graft infection considering the hypothermic state More tendency for endothelial cell, kupffer cell, and macrophage cell damage due to shear stress and hypothermic activation[110-113]Reduces IRI
When compared to SCS it decreases inflammatory cytokines but no difference in graft or patient survival was found[77,114]Provides nutrients (glucose, amino acids, etc.), medications to prevent micro-circulatory failure (e.g., prostacyclin, heparin, antibiotics), and oxygen
May help protect marginal livers by converting PNF into allograft dysfunction[71]Allows the assessment of organ viability (e.g., Galactose elimination, factor V production, bile flow)
May allow the use of gene therapy prior to transplantation, to reduce the risk of rejection, or decrease the ischemia-reperfusion injury[115-117]